Products
Daniel’s Deal: Winning the Relationship Is Only the Beginning
Read MoreProducts
Industries
Solutions
Insights
Winning the Relationship Is Only the Beginning
Daniel manages strategic corporate relationships for a regional bank. One of his largest clients has just signed a significant trade finance arrangement spanning several markets and instruments, including import and export letters of credit (LC), bank guarantees, supply chain finance, and documentary collections.
The deal has been won. The terms have been agreed. The contract is in place.
But for Daniel, that is where the real work begins. Because trade finance deals rarely remain exactly as they were when they were signed. Volumes change. Customers introduce new requirements. Transactions move across markets. Facilities are amended. New instruments are added. Concessions are requested.
And every change can affect the commercial economics of the original deal.
Trade finance is becoming increasingly complex as global trade routes evolve, supply chains are redrawn, and corporates look for more flexible working-capital structures.
Traditional instruments increasingly sit alongside open-account trade and supply chain finance.
For banks, the opportunity is significant. But so is the complexity of managing relationships that spans multiple products, markets, volumes, pricing structures, and changing customer needs.
For Daniel, winning the mandate is only the first milestone.
The bigger question is: can the bank continue to deliver what the customer needs without losing control of what the deal is worth?
Six months into the relationship, the client’s requirements start to change. Trade volumes in one market are higher than expected. A new trading corridor is being added. The client wants additional packing credit to support working-capital needs. An LC is amended. Other trade instruments are seeing higher or lower utilization than originally expected. And the customer asks Daniel to revisit some of the commercial terms as part of the changing relationship.
These changes may seem incremental. But together, they can change the structure, usage, and economics of the original deal.
A new market could introduce different risk and pricing considerations. Additional financing could alter the overall relationship value. A concession on one instrument could have implications for profitability elsewhere.
For Daniel, that means the job is no longer simply to manage the relationship he originally won. He now needs to manage how that relationship is evolving.
He must consider:
The complexity increases because different parts of the bank may handle different pieces of the relationship. One system processes an LC amendment. Another manages financing. A separate workflow handles approvals. Billing eventually applies the relevant charges.
But Daniel needs to see how all those changes connect back to the deal he originally negotiated. Daniel needs the commercial view.
The changes are now in motion. Daniel needs to make sure the commercial agreement keeps pace with them. The new trading corridor needs to be incorporated into the relationship, with its own pricing and risk considerations. The additional packing credit needs to be incorporated too. The amended LC needs to reflect the revised terms. Changes in volume and utilization need to be tracked against commitments. Any pricing exceptions need the right approvals. And once changes are agreed, the updated terms need to reach the teams and systems responsible for execution.
For Daniel, this means staying on top of more than individual transactions. He needs to manage the connection between what was agreed, what has changed, and what the bank is executing.
That requires him to:
This is what moves Deal Management beyond an approval workflow. A connected Deal Management approach enables Daniel to manage the evolution of the deal as one connected commercial relationship, responding to the customer while keeping execution aligned with what the bank agreed.
The trade finance relationship does not end when the contract is signed. It evolves with the customer. New markets. New instruments. Changing volumes. Amendments. New financing requirements. Commercial exceptions.
The challenge for the bank is to adapt to the customer needs without losing the commercial thread that connects every change back to the original deal.
Here is where a robust Deal Management platform can make a difference. By connecting deal terms, commitments, changes, approvals, and execution, it gives relationship teams the context to respond to customer demands, approvers the visibility to make informed decisions, and the business a clearer view of how the relationship is performing against its commercial objectives to ensure profitability.
For Daniel, the goal is not simply to manage more trade finance transactions. It is to manage the relationship behind them, adapting to what the customer needs while keeping every change connected to the economics of the deal. Because winning the trade finance relationship is only the beginning. The real value comes from managing it well as it evolves.